The best method is to use a common element in both images, line that element up in the various photos and the other objects in the photo are in the proper relative position then. I am not sure, how to get that view (Your 1st Image) in GIMP? I am getting a different view in GIMP, but your Photoshop clearly shows the car displacement ( Your 1st image). Reduce the opacity of the top layer so you can see the underlying layer as well:) but in Photoshop you place both images in the same document, on different layers. I did the same in GIMP (I'm not a GIMP user. How do you see the displaced distance between images as correct representation? How do I use a common element in both images, line that element up? Do you mind, sharing the GIMP steps to do that? These are scanned image with different zoom level. "The best method is to use a common element in both images, line thatĮlement up in the various photos and the other objects in the photoĪre in the proper relative position then." What is the beast way to overlay these two images by preserving displacement? I mean that image 2 is a distant view with displacement. If you review my separate images (base images), I am working with. You can review via photobucket using left arrow/right arroe ** It is not allowing to post the 3rd link. I find image 2 is layered on top of image 1, but the displaced distance is not representing realistically on layered image.I adjusted the opacity to provide transparency between image 1 & image 2.I created the 1st image from clipboard, I open a new layer and placed the 2nd object.I used GIMP to overlay both the images to figure out the displaced distance. I have same object(item) in image 1 & image 2, but the object was displaced between images. I have two raw images (image1 & image 2). How do I get realistic distance representation using GIMP?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |